« I’m still slouching though  •  Next Post »

The day Australia decided the Barrier Reef is not worth saving.

December 15, 2008 in Barry's Rant, Environment, Uncategorized, hpfm - Triple Bottom Line by barry

Today saw the current federal government cave into Australia’s filthiest companies and consigned the Barrier Reed, Kakadu and probably the Murray Darling System to history.

Given the chance to show that we truly understand how important the condidtion of the worlds atmosphere is, our representatives bubkled at the knees and gave i because it seems too hard.

They even decided to reward the most digusting forms of environmental vanadlism with an extra $4billion AUD.  This is equivalent to giving Rothmans money to fight lung cancer!!!

I thought the Rudd government was serious about this, but it seems oiling squeaky wheels is more effective if you want to stay in power.

This effort gets 3/10 simply because they announced a target - paltry and pathetic as that may be.

I guess its still slightly better than the other lot.

But either our kids, kids lose, severely.

I guess we become the titleholders of ‘most selfish lifeform ever’

RSS Open Source Initiative

  • A simple declaration about "Open Core"
    Recently, there has been debate in the press about "Open Core". I don't care to debate the minor points but make a simple declaration: read more
  • Resources for Open Source Compliance
    Open source is everywhere today and there is growing awareness that companies have to meet certain obligations when distributing open source software. Here are some useful resources to learn more about open source compliance. read more
  • Creating a FLOSS Roadmap, brick by BRIC
    Last year I attended Open World Forum in Paris. It was a lively conference with broad representation of industry leaders, community organizers, and government officials and administrators. The warm reception by the Mayor's office in Paris (at the Hôtel de Ville) underscored what has become increasingly obvious in the analysis of economic statistics: […]
  • Why Open Core has a problem and is not a problem.
    Pamela Jones, of Groklaw, thinks that OSI has a problem in Open Core. I think she has it backwards. The Open Core (most notably SugarCRM) folks have a problem. They'd like to convince people that they can achieve the open source effect by having two versions of their code: an open source version, and a proprietary version. They'd like to convin […]
  • Malaysian Government has reached 97% OSS Adoption -- WOW!
    When I started working on GNU C++ in 1987, I could almost feel the course of history changing with every line of code I wrote. When I started Cygnus Support in 1989, I was convinced that it was only a matter of time before companies began to realize that proprietary software restrictions did nothing to help their competitive advantage and everything to harm […]
  • Open Data Definition at OSCON
    I'm running a BOF at OSCON on Wednesday night July 21st at 7PM, with the declared purpose of adopting an Open Source Definition for Open Data. Safe enough to say that the OSD has been quite successful in laying out a set of criteria for what is, and what is not, Open Source. We should adopt a definition Open Data, even if it means merely endorsing an […]
  • Ushahidi tracks the Gulf Oil Spill: Open Source Crowdsourcing at Work
    On April 20th, 2010, a methane gas explosion ripped apart the operational oil rig "Deepwater Horizon" in the Gulf of Mexico. This accident has become a catastrophe - the largest oil spill in US history. It has damaged the entire ecosystem of life in the Gulf. The ocean waters and shorelines of Gulf states all the way to Florida and the Mississippi […]
  • Brazil and India: The Next Generation of Open Source
    Those of us who follow the growth of open source in the BRIC nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China) know that both Brazil and India are leveraging open source at a rapid pace towards economic development. Indiaread more
  • Your Chance To Change OSI
    When I said recently that we still need the Open Source Initiative (OSI), it started a flood of comment. There's no doubt that we need OSI - but we need a better OSI. The one we have now is just too small to be effective and too mired in past successes; a renaissance is needed. You can help. read more
  • OSI Committee Chairs Election for 2010-2011
    Earlier this month, the OSI board held elections for the organization's committees. Board members interested in working on OSI initiatives such as membership, education, policy and economic development, outreach submitted their candidacy to the board. Based on the slate of candidates, the board voted the following chairpersons to lead each OSI initiativ […]

You must be logged in to post a comment.